Bring in Chilean-style super tender process: Grattan InstituteBY JAMES FERNYHOUGH | MONDAY, 28 APR 2014 12:40PMThe government should get involved in picking default superannuation funds in order to increase competition and bring down fees, a Grattan Institute report has argued. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Value versus growth: Market expectations in 2024
In 2022, concerns about rising interest rates and the Russia-Ukraine war brought fundamentals back into focus, creating numerous opportunities for value investing to generate alpha. Then transitioning to the first half of 2023, that period saw significant performance for growth stocks. What's next?
Aware Super appoints general manager, strategy and transformation
The $175 billion superannuation fund has recruited from Deloitte for the newly created role.
Jinding funds management division spun off
The funds management division of Australian property group Jinding has launched as its own entity.
CFA Society Australia launches
CFA Society Australia has been launched following the amalgamation of three local CFA Societies.
Products
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
What a strange place for the Grattan Institute to source a superannuation fee model. Was that the land of the Juntas until recently? Apples with apples should be compared. It should not always be about fees. Industry super always talk up its low fee structure not considering some vanilla retail funds which also have low fee structures.
Many industry superannuation funds do not have anti detriment inclusions Fees created within our superannuation can include necessary commonwealth government compliance.
Keep up the think tanking Grattan Institute.